Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Net Neutrality Once Again At Risk

Net Neutrality Series, Part 4

Remember Net Neutrality? The term was coined by Columbia University professor Tim Wu in 2003 (ref). It's a topic I've written about in RapidGroove several times before (See part 1part 2part 3).

Net Neutrality is all about fair handling of traffic on the Internet. Without it, carriers could speed up traffic from, say, the audio and video services in which they have financial interests, and slow down or block the traffic of the ones where they do not. 

Net Neutrality is once again at risk. Today's FCC leadership is sympathetic to the wishes of the big carriers. In December, the FCC will vote on the “Restoring Internet Freedom Order.” The “freedom" in this case is clearly for network carriers, not you the Internet user, and the "restoring" part is about restoring the days before the FCC upheld the concepts of Net Neutrality, which the current FCC chairman characterizes as "heavy handed." But these regulations have helped to make the Internet a level playing field for new services. As a result, the FCC's likely next move will be a real blow to innovation. That's a loss for us all.

Net Neutrality is not an easy set of concepts to understand because it requires some understanding of the infrastructure of the Internet and because at times services that seem to be benefits to consumers (such as Zero Rating) are really providing a small benefit while creating an environment in which individuals and small companies cannot easily develop and deploy new services – all to protect the financial interests of a small number of very wealthy carriers with enormous lobbying power.

Perhaps even more troubling, there is evidence emerging that during open comment periods, more than a million comments calling for Net Neutrality repeal were fakes. Even public comments are struggling for a level playing field.

If you feel strongly about a free and open Internet, consider doing the following to help: 
** Write to your congress-person at  
** Join the EFF at

Finally, keep an eye on the vote in December and on the aftermath. The Internet is a powerful force and the final chapter of the Net Neutrality story has probably not yet been written.


Thanks for reading! A blog works best with active participation. If you enjoy this blog, please +1 it and leave a comment. Share it on your favorite social network. More readers will drive more discussion.

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Selling My Boat

... and buying another

At the end of the summer of 2017, I sold my boat – a 26’ center console Sailfish (the make) that I called "Freedom." It was a wonderful boat that I bought 11 years ago when it was 2 or 3 years old. Many great days were spent on that boat, fishing in the bay and the ocean, shuttling the family to the beach for a day of swimming, taking a few day trips to nearby port towns, and stopping off at our favorite marinas for a beautiful waterfront lunch.

Freedom, my boat for over 10 years
They say that the two happiest days of a boat owners life are the day they buy a boat and the day they sell it. For me, the day I bought Freedom was a very happy day. She was a gem and I loved every day out on the water with her. I can't say that the day I sold her was the happiest day, but it also wasn't the saddest. I hadn't grown tired of her. But ... 

They say a boat is a hole in the water you pour money into. While that wasn't really true for me I will say that maintenance was considerable and it was growing over time as the boat and the engines aged. I became convinced that Freedom would be a better boat for someone who did more of their own maintenance than I ever could. Someone who was handy and mechanically inclined and who would enjoy the work. That wasn't me. I'm happy to say that the buyer turned out to be just such a person. Someone whose family will love the boat the way I did, and who will do the work to restore her to her youthful beauty. He even promised to send me pictures as things progressed.

They say that a boat owner will gladly tell you a little about their boat, but will enthusiastically tell you a lot about their next boat. I guess that's true for me as well. On the afternoon after I sold my boat, I went boat shopping. I climbed aboard several late model center console fishing boats – Boston Whalers, Grady Whites, Edgewaters and Cobias in the 26' to 30' size range. All were great boats. I'll continue to shop over the fall and winter, in hopes of finding a new boat by late spring for the 2018 season.

I already miss my 26’ Sailfish “Freedom,” but I look forward to a long term love affair with my next boat! Please wish me luck for the summer of 2018. I'll gladly post pictures when I eventually make a purchase.

Thanks for reading! A blog works best with active participation. If you enjoy this blog, please +1 it and leave a comment. Share it on your favorite social network. More readers will drive more discussion.

Friday, September 29, 2017

Should I get an iPhone X?

I've been using iPhones since the early days, usually getting every other model. I had a 3G, a 4, a 5, and a 6 plus. Right now I have an SE as a stop gap. I'm due for a phone soon and wonder about the iPhone 8 and the iPhone X. The iPhone 8 looks like the standard upgrade -- a better processor, more available storage, better camera, designed to run modern iOS. I could go with that. Meanwhile the iPhone X looks like a nice evolution of the iPhone, with an edge to edge high resolution screen and "Face ID" replacing Touch ID. Look at your phone to unlock it.

Image Credit: The Verge
By past standards, the iPhone X is an expensive phone, starting at about $1000. But that seems to be the new price point for a flagship smartphone. The Samsung Galaxy Note8, another phone with an edge to edge screen, is in the same price range. That may be what those interested in state of the art smart phones will be paying this year and next.

I must admit that the thing that has me on the fence about the new iPhone X is not the price. I'm willing to spend a little more for a phone that I will rely upon in a major way for a good long while (I keep my phones for 2 years when possible). It's actually some concern that Face ID will turn out to be awkward or unreliable or quirky in situations we don't yet understand. For these reasons, I'm thinking of waiting until about January 2018 for early reports from real users before I decide whether to order an iPhone X. I guess I won't get to be the "early adopter" that everyone envies, but I'll have a better idea what I'm in for.

How about you? Are you ordering an iPhone X? Does my caution seem misplaced to you? I'd really love to know! Please leave a comment.

Thanks for reading! A blog works best with active participation. If you enjoy this blog, please +1 it and leave a comment. Share it on your favorite social network. More readers will drive more discussion.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Floods and Technology

Harvey, the hurricane and tropical storm hitting Texas and other Gulf Coast locations, has clearly been devastating. Stories and images of massive destruction, people forced from their homes, and damage and loss of property fill the news. Most tragically, there has been loss of life. The impacts of this massive storm on the communities hardest hit will be felt for a very long time. When the waters recede, we will likely see many homes, streets, roadways and bridges that are damaged beyond repair.
One interesting and positive element of the story is that computers, smart phones, and communications technology are all being leveraged exceptionally well in flood relief efforts. A Washington Post story reported, “Using social media, flood victims who still had power were able to communicate with public officials directly or to bypass them entirely and coordinate their own rescues with private citizens.”

On the flip side of the coin, technology has also been a casualty of the storm. Flooding has caused damage to communications infrastructure including cell towers and fiber and coax cable in the ground. This hampers the efforts of the many first responders and volunteers who are working so hard to help those affected.

In the weeks and months after the storm clears the area and waters recede, and as people begin to return to their flood-damaged homes, personal technology is likely to have taken a major hit. Home computers and the data they hold, including important financial documents and the digital photo collections of families, may be damaged beyond recovery. This is another opportunity to think about how we treat and protect data in our personal life, and perhaps a good argument for cloud-based data backups of digital assets we never want to lose.

How do you protect your technology and your data from physical risks like floods? Please leave a comment and share your thoughts with us.


Thanks for reading! A blog works best with active participation. If you enjoy this blog, please +1 it and leave a comment. Share it on your favorite social network. More readers will drive more discussion.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Amazon Buys Whole Foods ... Why?

$13.7 billion buys a lot of organic free-range semi-seasoned fair-trade fresh-squeezed coffee beans

Image Credit TechCrunch
I honestly don’t know anything at all about the grocery business. If none of my thinking here makes sense, please leave comments and help me to learn. But having watched Amazon for many years as they go from simple online book seller to purveyor of all things, to behemoth back-end web-services provider, I’m not sure that Amazon simply wants to be in the supermarket business. Of course, they might be, so I’ll list that first in my list of possible reasons why Amazon is willing to spend $13.7 billion on Whole Foods.

Which of these rings most true to you? Amazon will...
  1. seriously enter the traditional supermarket business
  2. use the Whole Foods locations as retail store fronts for Amazon products
  3. leverage Whole Foods’ supply chain and locations to super-charge their own Amazon Fresh delivery business
  4. operate Whole Foods and significantly drop prices in order to start a supermarket price war. Weaken at least some of the competition and push others out, after which Amazon Fresh and traditional Amazon dry goods grocery items can gain market share
  5. do something I haven’t thought of yet
I find #4 to be the most interesting.

Amazon seems particularly focused on Walmart and Target (big retailers who also sell groceries) and would love to deal them a serious blow. If along the way Amazon can damage some of the big supermarket chains while simultaneously boosting their own multi-faceted food business (Amazon Fresh, traditional Amazon food sales, and the rumored Amazon competitor to Blue Apron), that would be a very savvy business move.

Does this sound improbable to you? Not to me. Just think back on Amazon’s history and the way they have aggressively moved into other business areas (AWS), acquired great businesses (Zappos), and destroyed businesses they perceived to be in their way ( I think anything is possible.

What do you think?